Industries
SEO for nonprofits
People give time and money when they understand a program and trust the numbers. A generated story about a person who does not exist spends that trust.
A nonprofit site has to do several jobs at once: explain a program, show where money goes, help someone volunteer or refer, and report what happened. Those are different pages. A blog is the right place for the explanation that changes with the season, the field note you have permission to share, and the practical guide a beneficiary or a volunteer needs.
It is the wrong place for invented impact. Models will create a child, a village, a percentage, and a quote. If you publish them, you have made a claim your annual report cannot support. This guide is how to publish useful articles and keep the facts inside what your team can evidence.
Explain the program as it runs this year
Who it is for, who it is not for, how a person gets access, what they receive, and what they are asked to do. Include the constraint: a waiting list, a geography, a partner you depend on. Readers make better decisions with the constraint than with a brochure that implies you can help everyone.
If last year's program closed, say so. An article that still invites applications to a closed service creates work for the inbox and disappointment for the applicant.
Numbers come from your records
People helped, money spent, and outcomes are either in a report you can point to or they stay out of the draft. "Thousands of families" is not a style choice. It is a figure. Round it only in a way your finance lead accepts, and name the period.
Do not let the writer turn an output into an outcome. Meals distributed is not "lives transformed" unless you have the evidence and the ethics approval to say that. Stay with the verb you measured.
Stories need consent, not just a good paragraph
A beneficiary story needs informed consent for this use, the chance to review, and a decision about names and photos. A volunteer story needs the same. A composite must be labeled and must not be a specific person with the name filed off.
Generated portraits of "the people you help" are a particularly bad idea. Use photos you have rights to, or use none. Dignity is part of the communication, not a tone the model can add at the end.
Appeals and explainers are different drafts
An appeal needs a current need, a way to give, and claims your board would sign. An explainer needs to stay useful after the campaign ends. Do not bury the only description of a program inside a donation page that you will swap out in December.
If a funder requires specific wording, put that wording in the brief as a quote with a source. Do not let the model improvise a theory of change you have not agreed.
Write so the front line recognizes it
Program staff should read anything that tells a beneficiary what to do. Fundraising can read the ask. Communications can hold the pen. Publishing on a cadence that skips program staff is how the website contradicts the person at the door.
A few accurate guides, updated when the program changes, are enough. You do not need to sound like a newsroom. You need a site that a trustee, a donor, and a participant can all read without finding a different organization in each article.
Topics worth writing
- How a specific program works this season, including who it cannot take
- How to refer someone, with the real steps and the documents
- How to volunteer, including what you will not ask volunteers to do
- Where money goes, using figures from a report you can link
- What changed in the program and why, in language participants will recognize
- How a donor's question gets answered, without a new promise
Before you publish
- Impact figures match a record or a published report.
- No person's story or photo appears without the right consent.
- The program described is open in the way the article says.
- A program lead has read instructions aimed at beneficiaries or referrers.
- The ask, if there is one, matches a live way to give or help.
Questions
Can we use AI to draft grant-style language?
You can draft structure. The need, the budget, and the outcomes have to be yours. Do not submit generated claims to a funder.
What if we lack a good photo?
Use none, or use a picture of the work that does not identify a participant. A generated face is not a neutral substitute.
Should every campaign get a blog post?
The campaign page can carry the appeal. Add an article when you have an explanation that should survive the campaign.
How do we correct a number?
Change it on the page, note the date, and tell the colleague who might have repeated it. Quiet edits of impact figures are how trust breaks later.
